Full text available in PDF format (above) BJU International (1999), 84, 101–102 K.R. SHANKAR and A.M.K. RICKWOOD Department of Paediatric Urology, Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK Abstract Objective To establish the incidence of pathological phimosis in boys. Patients … Read More
Full text in PDF format (above) Abstract: Background A decrease in risk of urinary-tract infection is one of the most commonly given reasons for circumcision of newborn boys. Previous studies have reported rates of UTI to be 10–20 times … Read More
Full text available in PDF format (above) Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To document prospectively variation in penile morphology and clinical findings in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised a consecutive sample of 468 boys whose consultation with a physician included a … Read More
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Volume 78: pages 786-788, November 1996. by Z. GOLUBOVIC*, D. MILANOVIC+, V. VUKADINOVIC+, I. RAKIC* and S. PEROVIC+ *Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery +Department of Pediatric Urology, University Children’s Hospital, Belgrade, Yugoslavia. Objective To further … Read More
Full text in PDF format (above) Abstract: Thirty thousand circumcisions are performed annually in England and 70% of these are upon boys under 15 years of age. In the Mersey Region some 950 boys are circumcised each year for … Read More
Full text available for members in PDF format (above) Abstract: Five men underwent circumcision in adulthood for reasons of infection, inflammation, or phimosis. Several years later, they reported on the erotosexual sequelae. All reported a prolongation of the period prior … Read More
Also available here: http://adc.bmj.com/content/43/228/200.citation Arch Dis Child 1968;43:200-203 doi:10.1136/adc.43.228.200 Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys. by J. Oster Full text (PDF): Arch Dis Child-1968-Oster-200-3.pdf Rate this article's helpfulness: